Zeugma Mac OS
It allows a user's Mac laptop to function as a recording studio, and supports any Mac OS X-compatible audio I/O device. While the application offers great capabilities for amateur sound mixing and music production, it's likewise a fantastic program to use in podcasting. Mac OS X (10.5+) 0.5: Available View build log: 0.2: Available View build log: Linux (32-bit) 0.5: Available View build log: 0.2.
A2 Flash PhpPhotoGallery 1.0 is designed as an excellent internet utility for everyone. It is actually a powerful tool that makes adding and displaying your images fast and easy!! The advanced Actionscript code written in Flash uses smart. ...
- A2Flash_Server_demo.zip
- AFLASHSOFT
- Demo ($149.00)
- 26.4 Mb
- Mac OS X or later
The easy way to design, organize, display, upload online Flash PhotoGallery. The gallery runs off advanced PHP with MySQL database, Actionscript code, No Flash PHP programming is required. Simply choose category, gallery and upload images. Thats all. ...
- A2Flash_Server_demo.zip
- AFLASHSOFT
- Demo ($59.00)
- 26.42 Mb
- Linux, Mac OS X, Mac OS X 10.1, Mac OS X 10.2, Mac OS X 10.3, Mac OS X 10.4, Mac OS X 10.5
Just3Files is a PHP web photogallery that simply let u view ur folders of photos with its corresponding EXIF description (with autorotation and resize) by just putting in 3 files on your home folder! Template-base (change of outlook), No DB. ...
- Just3Files PHP Photo Gallery
- sourceforge
- Freeware (Free)
- 5 Kb
- Windows; Mac; Linux
A web photogallery written in PHP for viewing photos from your digital camera in various sizes on a web site. The package also contains a shell script that generates the photos in different. ...
- photogallery-1.4.4.tar.gz
- nlphotogallery
- Freeware (Free)
- 33 Kb
- Windows; BSD; Mac; Solaris; Linux
Zeugma - A complete online photogallery written in PHP, which features automatic-thumbnail creation, skinning, comments, category system, user administration, featured image, password areas, searching, and image framing without the need for a. ...
- zeugmacore-v1-2-2-beta.zip
- zeugma
- Freeware (Free)
- 51 Kb
- Windows; BSD; Linux
LinPHA is an easy to use, multilingual, flexible photo/image archive/album/gallery written in PHP. It uses a SQL database to store information about your pictures. It comes with a HTML based installer, so you don't need experience in setting up. ...
- linpha-1.3.4.zip
- linpha
- Freeware (Free)
- 1.64 Mb
- Windows; Mac; Solaris; Linux
A Simple PHP Photo Gallery. All you have to do is create a folder, put the images in the folder. Thats it.
- PHP Simple Gallery
- simple-gallery
- Freeware (Free)
- 2 Kb
- Windows; Mac; Linux
Tukanas PhotoGallery Manager script is a convenient PHP script. It presents digital image files as an online gallery or set of galleries. Installation is very quick and galleries are easy to organize and mange using your favorite FTP or SCP file man. ...
- photo.exe
- Tucana International
- Shareware ($29.90)
- 552 Kb
- Win 3.1x, Win95, Win98, WinME, WinNT 3.x, WinNT 4.x, Windows2000, WinXP, Windows2003, Windows Vista
Just drag and drop your photos or folders with photos and press 'Publish' to get your web photogallery ready! Vista PhotoGallery is the first software that creates AJAX-powered online image galleries without the need for server-side setup.
- vistaphotogallery-setup.exe
- Vista-Buttons.com
- Shareware ($39.00)
- 1.27 Mb
- Win95, Win98, WinXP, Windows2000, Windows2003, Windows Media Center Edition 2005, Windows Vista
Creates easily professional Flash Slideshow, Photo-gallery, Portfolio totally customizing ready for web with Preloading, Miniatures, Buttons, Transitions, Animated effects, Roll-over, Actionscript etc Source files .Fla are included. Demo Free. ...
- a2flash_demo.exe
- AFLASHSOFT
- Demo ($126.00)
- 23.44 Mb
- Win98, WinME, WinXP, Windows2000, Windows2003, Linux
SkyAlbum PhotoGallery Builder is an easy to use freeware that help you create stunning flash web photogallery with a few mouse clicks and then upload the the SkyAlbum free web space. Easily share your photos with friends.
- setup_skyalbumphotogallery.exe
- Skyalbum
- Freeware (Free)
- 11.09 Mb
- Windows2000, WinXP, Windows2003, Windows Vista
XML PhotoGallery for Actionscript 3.0. All configuration is made via and external XML file. Very easy to use and to update. Well commented code. Set size in the embedded code and it will size automatically. Comes with a magnetic effect scroller.
- XML Photo Gallery
- FlashComponents
- Shareware ($3.00)
- 488 Kb
- Win98, WinME, WinXP, Windows2000, Windows2003, Windows Vista
Related:Php Photo Gallery - Photo Gallery Web Php Script - Photo Image Gallery Php Script - Php Gallery Script - Thumbnail Gallery Php
| Free Republic Browse · Search | General/Chat Topics · Post Article |
ZDNet News & Blogs ^ 3/18/2010 by David Morgenstern
Posted on 03/19/2010 3:15:37 AM PDT by Swordmaker
Shocking: A recent survey of enterprise IT managers that administer both PCs and Macs finds that Macs have a better TOC (total cost of ownership) than Windows boxes, and require less user training and help.
The respondents were given the option to select from a range of cost differences. Not only did the administrators across the board say that Macs were less expensive, in all but one category the majority of administrators who said Macs cost less said they were more than 20 percent less expensive to manage than PCs. Of those who asserted that PCs cost less, the majority always asserted that PCs were between 0 and 20 percent less expensive to manage than Macs.
The Enterprise Desktop Alliance survey took results from organizations that had 50 or more servers or over 100 Macs, what the organization said were enterprises, academic sites and government agencies.
The figures that pop out from the chart are those for the time spent troubleshooting problems (16 vs 65 percent, PC and Macs, respectively), dealing with help desk calls (16 vs 54 percent), training users (16 vs 48 percent) and managing system configs. (25 vs 50 percent).
At the Macworld Expo last month, I spoke to T. Reid Lewis, president of the EDA and CEO of Group Logic, a maker of network software and Mac integration products such as ExtremeZ-IP. He pointed out that important enterprise service and back-end platform companies were coming on board the multiplatform bandwagon. That includes IBM, which joined the EDA in Feb. Big Blue’s Informix database, Rational software delivery automationware and Lotus messaging and collaboration platform support Macs, and the company had a booth at the Expo.
Absolute Software, the maker of LoJack and Absolute Manage also joined the EDA in Feb.
Macs are coming into the enterprise and support for them in familiar software management and delivery consoles is catching up. While IT management remains suspicious of the Mac platform and most admins focus on Microsoft certification programs rather than Mac OS X certifications, users continue to purchase Macs and request support.
According to Gene Munster, Piper Jaffray analyst, the year-to-year retail sales of Macs climbed 39 percent during January and February. He said this means some 2.8 to 2.9 million Macs were be sold in the quarter.
Another recent EDA survey found that 66 percent of IT administrators in large organizations that currently have both Macs and PCs will increase the number of Macs in their sites. The reasons? In addition to the ease of support (and the associated cost reductions found in the survey above), user preference, and increased productivity.
We can point to many places for the rise in the Mac’s status: Apple’s continuing execution on its Mac OS X platform; the company’s focus on hardware quality and technological advances in a time when PC makers have raced to the bottom of the market with netbooks and crappy low-cost systems; support for Intel processors and Windows virtualization; the halo effect of the iPod and iPhone platforms; the terrible introduction of Windows Vista; the Apple Store strategy; or others.
Whatever the combination of reasons or just the fact that the Mac is better, users seem to have shaken off the past FUD from Redmond and Intel that fell on the Apple platform. I spoke to a white-collar professional yesterday who is looking at buying a new notebook. He has never used anything other than a PC. But now, he’s seriously looking at a Mac. I told him to go to the local Apple retail store and get a tour.
IT managers will have to deal. They can be thankful that integration is easier than ever and getting better all the time.
KEYWORDS:ilovebillgates; iwanthim; iwanthimbad; microsoftfanboysNavigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first1-20, 21nextlast
TOTAL OWNERSHIP COST
Macs Cost LESS than PCs
Ping!
If you want on or off the Mac Ping List, Freepmail me.
Swordmaker's BACK!
Macs rock. Just the facts!
I don’t have an apple yet, but it doesn’t surprise me. Microsoft seems to be wandering in the wilderness when it comes to windows these days.
I have only owned one PC. I buckled under the pressure to replace my aging, yet fully functional Mac SE with a Dell something or other.
It is truly amazing how many little tiny pieces a PC breaks into when you clobber it with a sledgehammer
:)
From their website: 'Making it easy to deploy, integrate and manage Macs in a Windows environment.'
And global warming is real, too.
Got to remember that the it was to folks who do graphic designs/multimedia work.
My faithful 15 inch MacBook Pro with Intel chip runs without complaint day after day, year after year. I keep the OS up to date (Snow Leopard), and upgrading so far has been painless
I have a Dell Studio 8000 which I use for various tasks around home. Just converted to Windows 7, and am still trying to find my way.
I like the Studio 8000, and love the MacBook Pro.
Off-topic, but last night I installed the VMWare workstation 7.1 beta on my Fedora12 desktop last night after having spent way too much time trying to get Server running. OMG, but that was the easiest vmware installation I've ever seen on Linux! For once, no patching was required. So far haven't hit any bugs, and have done some initial testing with both some pre-existing VMs and built a couple of new Fedora VMs. Overall, things seem to finally be coming together for VMWare on Linux. It's always pissed me off that you had to jump through hoops on previous versions considering VMWare itself is built on Linux.
..and kickin' off with three new Mac Pings, to boot!
As the drunken Scotsman said when awoke on the roadside,
'Well, Laddie, I denna ken where ye've been -- but I see ye won first prize!'
Welcome BACK! '-)
For you.
Yay!
Zeugma Mac Os Catalina
Virtualization is actually a boon for the Mac at the client end. There's no way to run OS X on a virtual machine (*), but Macs can run Windows VMs with fewer support hassles than Windows boxes. Citrix has had a Mac client for at least a decade, and they're even promising a client for the iPad.
It's not a recipe for the Mac to take over a dominant position in enterprise computing, but that's not a very realistic near-term goal anyway. With virtualization, companies can continue to develop enterprise applications on Windows, and then run them on Macs or Linux or whatever.
* Macs support netbooting, which is kinda close enough to a virtual machine, but it only runs on Mac clients.
Well, where the hell have YOU been?
Captain Obvious phoned this in.
The other thing is that if Apple wants to gain server share at some point, they are going to have to allow virtualization, which is becoming more and more common for many reasons, including the need to prevent “server sprawl.”
That said, I do believe that a Mac network would be easier to maintain than a Windows network. Mac networks of any size don’t really exist, though, outside of academia and the occasional design house. This is partially because vertical apps are largely written in VB/ASP/.NET by foreigners generating code out of a framework.
Also, VMware had better get on the ball. While VMware workstation may work well on Fedora, other VMware products are really falling behind on Linux support, and even the browser interface is buggy, which affects everyone. There are other virtualization options which will become more attractive if VMware doesn’t clean up its act.
I absolutely agree (see post 9 of this thread).
Funny thing is, 'server sprawl' is being replaced by 'vm sprawl', because there is still a mentality amongst a lot of folks that you dedicate a box to a task. I've seen this where I work in a big way. The amount of resources wasted because of this mind-set is staggering. One of the things that has really annoyed me with the advent of virtualization in our organization is that it masks inefficiency, and poor design. We see these glowing reports about the huge number of servers being consolodated by our windows support group, (Hey! We're getting 40-1 consolidation on our servers!) yet no thought is given to the millions of dollars this group has wasted over the years because of their poor planning and other choices made. Over on the unix side of the house on the other hand, we're lucky to get 5-1 consolidation because we've been taking full advantage of our available hardware for years. Rather than having 40 individual webservers with maybe one or two apps on them, we run 40-50 sites apache servers on each box, so naturally you're not going to gain a hell of a lot when you move them to a VM farm.
I'm a big supporter of virtualization because it makes it much easier to take advantage of the advances that have come from the incredible increases in horsepower you see in hardware these days, but I think folk would do well to take a look at some of their other assumptions as well.
Meant to comment on this as well, but it looks like I had an ADD moment. I also agree with you about VMWare's linux support. I don't really think the other offerings have quite caught up with VMWare yet in most ways, though I see a place for them in an enterprise. Zen, in particular is some cool tech, but I personally like the greater degree of separation of instances provided through offerings more similar to VMWare.
One of our older VM farms has been experiencing regular catastrophic failures in recent months. I don't really know the cause, but when I chart our uptime stats for our unix servers, it is obvious which ones are VMs and which are still physical (200+days vs less than 30 on average. -We've got servers that have been up for 800+ days and I can tell you that they sure as hell aren't VMs.)
A lot of the reason this happens is due to the Windows philosophy of each application having its own dedicated machine.
Ask a Microsoft guy to lay out a basic network, and he’s going to recommend a AD/domain controller, app server and terminal server, each on their own dedicated machine.
At least with virtualization, this can be one or two machines instead of three.
Agreed. I think it points up a decided weakness in the architecture. The reason they insist on laying stuff out like this is because bad things happen for them when they don't. Once bitten twice shy.
At least with virtualization, this can be one or two machines instead of three.
Yup, but I'd say that it is basically covering up decisions made for their underlying tech. I'm always astounded when windows guys recommend 3rd party apps on windows boxes for something that is a native unix app. For instance we recently had a requirement to build out an FTP server. I'm not going to go into the fundamental insanity of running FTP in 2010 (anonymous FTP yes, but anytthing else is as fundamentally insane as using telnetd), but the requirement was there nonetheless. The recommendation from the windows guys was a dedicated server running some 3rd party app that I can't recall at the moment. We recommended an existing server running vsftp.
It's definitely a different mentality, and one that costs corporate America a lot of money every day.
first1-20
Mac Os Download
, 21nextlastMac Os Versions
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
| Free Republic Browse · Search | General/Chat Topics · Post Article |